We need to talk about gin (2)
In my last post, we took a lightning-fast sprint through 500
years of gin history, from juniper-flavoured tonic wines to the development of
the London Dry style and discovering how well it mixed with medicinal compounds
to make them enjoyable to take.
‘London Dry’ denotes a style of gin, not a geographical
origin. It’s a clear spirit that has been distilled with roots, berries and
seeds to flavour the spirit. A significant proportion of these flavourings must
be juniper. Angelica and coriander are the most common other ingredients. No
additional sugar is added. ‘Old Tom’ gin, an older style that is enjoying an
increase in popularity, as modern drinkers seek out different experiences, is
made with fewer, stronger flavourings and sweetened after distillation.
During the cocktail boom of the early 20th
century, London Dry gin became the style of gin to use. Its clean taste and dry
finish make it ideal for mixing with other flavours. Well-known cocktails like
the White Lady, the Martini and the Negroni all belong to this era, and gin
found its way into all sorts of combinations. One or two of these combinations
might surprise us. Did you know, for instance, that the original spirit in an Alexander
cocktail was gin? It’s quite a startling drink in its original form, nothing
like as reassuring as its brandy-based offspring, and worth trying out.
Place ice in a shaker
with a measure of cream, a measure of white crème de cacao and a measure of
London gin. Shake hard and strain into a goblet. Finish with a little grated
dark chocolate.
Fans of the White Lady may be surprised to know that she,
too, is a derivative. Before the Lady went pale, she was as pink as they come. Try
this Pink Lady recipe:
In a shaker of ice,
place a measure of strong gin, a tablespoon of alcoholic grenadine cordial and
about a tablespoon of egg white. Shake very vigorously for a minute or so, then
strain into a coupe glass.
The resulting drink is slightly sweet, very smooth, and tasting
of every one of its juniper berries.
Gin went slowly out of fashion from the 1950s onwards, and
by the 1980s seemed to be the preserve of the middle-aged. However, in 1986, International
Distillers and Vintners took the bold step of launching a new gin on the market.
It’s main selling point was to be the large number of interesting flavourings
it used, images of which were etched onto the sides of its unique, pale blue
bottle. Drinkers learnt a new word – ‘botanicals.’ Sold at a higher price and alcoholic
strength than most others on the market at the time, it immediately positioned itself as a
luxury product, a gin for the knowledgeable and discerning. What a stroke of
genius! Almost overnight, Bombay Sapphire re-vivified the gin market, and it
wasn’t long before other producers were looking to follow its example.
In 2009 the Sipsmith Distillery became the first in over two
hundred years to be granted a licence specifically for gin. A few years later, excise
regulations were relaxed again, making it easier to obtain a licence for
small-scale commercial production of spirits. The outcome of this relaxation,
tied to the resurgence in interest in gin as a drink, was an explosion in the
number of gins on the market. Small-scale distillers, unable to compete with
big brands on price, have marketed their product as local, with strong ties to
their home town or city, or as ‘craft,’ focusing on the contribution made by careful
producers. In the publicity materials, family stories abound, alongside descriptions of rare botanicals and unique properties of local waters.
And here we see one of the challenges of the current boom.
Local sells, but ‘local’ gins are not always made in the town whose name they
bear. Is this a problem? If the gin tastes good, does it matter where it was
produced? Well, yes and no. If I’m buying it because it tastes good, that’s all
that really matters. However, if I’ve been persuaded to buy because of its
connection to a particular town or region, then I’m making a choice to support
employment in that area and should be able to have confidence that most of the work
done around this gin is done in the area named. Ask before you buy.
Once a drink becomes fashionable, more and more people will
want to try it. In the past, if you tried a drink and disliked it, you moved
on. With the gin boom, what seems to be happening is that drinks manufacturers
will quickly bring out a new gin with flavours you might like. This needn’t be
a problem, and the history of gin is one of changing the flavour to make it
more palatable. We know that young palates are particularly sensitive to
bitterness. It’s the reason children dislike sprouts. We also know that they
have a low sensitivity to sweetness, which is why we grow out of our love of
candy floss and seaside rock as we get older. However, what gin has always had, what gives it
its name, indeed, is the bitter, astringent taste of the juniper berry. There
are hundreds of new gins on the market every year, many of which are highly
sweetened and flavoured of all kinds of things that mask the juniper. Are these
made for people who dislike gin but want to be seen to be drinking it? Do they
not have the confidence to drink something they like better if it has a different name?
EU consumer-protection regulations require any product calling itself gin to be
above 35.5% ABV and to taste predominantly of juniper. While the first of those
conditions can be objectively verified, the second one is really a matter for
the individual’s response. I’m sure the bubble in the gin market is going to
burst soon. I’m confident that once it does, many of the new gins will survive.
London Dry will continue to be the dominant style, but the interest in other
styles, such as Old Tom, will continue. Another popular style may emerge, offering a new angle on the taste of juniper. Maybe even one or two of the ‘lollipop gins’
will survive as niche liqueurs. The rest will go the same way as Cherry B,
Taboo & coke and Hooch – an indulgent memory of something we wouldn’t dream
of ever going back to.
Next time: a Welsh foodie roadtrip
Comments
Post a Comment